August 30, 2001
Search Engine superiority is a big stakes game of one-upmanship that we won’t see the end of soon.
I think that when many of us discovered Google we figured that the search wars were over and we’d found our home. Of course we said this forgetting that we’d said the same thing years before when we met Yahoo! for the first time. And then we said it again when someone sent us a link to AltaVista. And then again when we clicked the Hotbot link from Wired.
I doubt that Google will be the final champion in the search game (at least not if they stick to current technology while others advance — hopefully they won’t).
For a review of the current state of Internet search, check out this CNET article called “Start-ups Seek Google’s Throne”. One site they don’t mention that is probably worth monitoring (although it is pre-launch as I’m typing this) is Quigo, a “deep web” search tool.
And of course, Search Engine Watch is a great place for general information on search and how it effects you and your site.
People like the Internet even if venture capitalists don’t.
This CNET article discusses a recent Gartner Dataquest survey that found that 65% of American homes now use the Internet on a regular basis and almost 25% of those households are on broadband connections (primarily cable).
Further, 91% said that they intend to stay connected which Gartner took as a sign that the Internet is now an essential part of the American home.
It’s clear that consumers love the Net and businesses need to understand that despite the anti-hype, this channel is not going away.
August 29, 2001
For those of us still mourning the loss of The Industry Standard, this article at [email protected] gives some detail on its demise.
More people are growing concerned about Gator and its pervasive use of technology to hijack sites for its own advertising ends. Here are three recent articles on the increasingly controversial company:
(Thanks to Dave M for the bbspot.com pointer)
August 24, 2001
The print version of the newly minted Business 2.0 gets two big thumbs up.
The magazine has taken the best of eCompany Now (which was getting pretty darn good on its own over the last few issues) and the best of Business 2.0 (always a favourite) and put them together into a really nice package. My understanding is that we’ll see a bit of a redesign happening this fall, but for now it looks pretty much like eCompany with Xplanations inserted.
One article that really jumped out and made me think a bit was this one called “Why So Many People (Not You, Of Course) Made So Many Brain-Dead Investments (And How Not to Make Them Again)”. While the article is really about the markets, I think it is also important reading for those of us working on strategic partnerships, business development and strategy building. It is very easy for these same flaws in logic to infect our thinking about business decisions as well as stock picking. Consider it a must read for Internet strategists.
Finally we have conclusive proof that NASA faked the moon landing.
Nice to see Canadian online grocer (although they may not like that term) Grocery Gateway getting some nice press in CNET via Reuters.
August 22, 2001
Autodemo has a cool technology for online site demonstrations.
I was checking out the DVD of “The Straight Story” when I noticed an option to get an automated demo of Amazon’s 1-click ordering system. Since this was new and I always find Amazon to be on the cutting edge of customer experience (note that I didn’t say cutting edge of technology), I clicked the link.
The demo worked as advertised and didn’t require any downloads (it’s all Flash-based).
I think we’ll see more of this type of technology evolving as companies focus on improving usability as a way of increasing sales. Now we have to hope that people won’t take to creating hopelessly complicated technologies and then using demos to cover-up their poor design.
(The Straight Story is an outstanding film by David Lynch, although you would never know it was a Lynch film).
While the expression “the Internet changes everything” might be out of fashion, I keep running into things that I can’t imagine existing in a non-Net world.
Here we have what some would consider a stereotypical British eccentric who has become a bit obsessed with the fence where he used to lock up his bike.
The site is a one man effort providing statistics on how long various items stay on the fence after he chains them on. The people who own the building are going crazy trying to keep up with “the fencemaster.”
What is really fascinating is that many people are following his “adventures” on the Net and making requests for various items they’d like to see on the fence. People are now starting to visit the fence in question as a tourist spot. Some are adding their own items.
I can’t imagine how the world could get involved in one man’s fight to chain things to a fence without the Net. Seriously, find an hour or so and dive into the mind of another person. Fascinating and scary.
August 21, 2001
We should all take a moment to mourn the passing of the Industry Standard magazine this week.
Of all the dotcom casualties, I find this one hitting hard. The Standard was always one of the better sources of information on the Internet industry and I’ll miss its no-nonsense style.
The San Francisco Chronicle can fill you in on all the sad details…
August 16, 2001
E-mail marketers need to consider how the fight against spam may in fact be hurting their ethical e-mail campaigns.
Editor And Publisher has a really good article called Spam Fighters Block Legit E-mail that gives real world examples of what can happen to a perfectly legitimate e-mail as it winds its way through increasingly strict filtering systems on the web. Definitely worth a read for anyone managing an opt-in list.
Maybe I should pick up a Pepsi with those Lifesavers…
I think we’ll see more of this online/offline promotion blending as it lets the web do what it’s good at — instant access, database building, cheap content distribution — and let’s offline promotion do what it is good at — build brand, increase trial and impulse purchases, and create word of mouth.
I also thought it refreshing (pardon the pun) that Pepsi didn’t start sending the 3.5 million people who registered the Pepsi corporate newsletter, but rather built another great promotion around voting on the all-time best Pepsi ad. 320,000 people watching your ads online is not bad!
August 15, 2001
I have to go buy some Lifesavers.
As you can see from this MediaPost article Lifesavers has come up with a GOOD way to go “beyond the banner.”
Essentially what they’ve done is pay About.com to change their logo so that the “o” in About is replaced by a Lifesaver, like this:
Clicking the logo launches a large graphic pop-up for a Lifesavers contest.
This to me is inventive and consumer friendly as it adds a little serenpidity to surfing but doesn’t really interfere with the task at hand the way pop-ups/unders do.
Of course the idea is not a new one. We’ve seen Yahoo and Excite do this type of stuff back in 1996 with “101 Dalmatians” spots on the background of the home page. More recently MarketWatch has been selling “wallpaper” as an ad space (the jury is out on that).
August 14, 2001
Not enough people think of web design as software design.
This article on adobe.com called “Style vs. Design” is a rather personal rant on the need for a better understanding of what “style” is for, and what “design” is.
Here’s a quote:
“Most of all, I worry about Web users. Because, after six years of commercial Web development, they still have a tough time finding what they’re looking for, and they still wonder why it’s so damned unpleasant to read text on the Web — which is what most of them do when they’re online.”
August 7, 2001
It’s good to see that Google is profitable. Good design and a realistic business model can make for success.
Here’s an article on Google and its new CEO Eric Schmidt:
This CNET Article gives more details on the increasingly antagonistic approach to marketing that is developing online.
One of the biggest issues I see with these applications that “enhance” the browsing experience (thereby offering new ways to advertise) is how the consumer actually gets the application in the first place. If the application is unknowingly downloaded as spy-ware along with a wanted application and then is very hard to get off a user’s hard drive, is it really ethical to support such applications? The fact that Gator is happy being known as “hijackware” says something about their feelings towards consumers I think.
MarketingSherpa has a nice case study on Norm Thompson that is worth checking out. This is a good example of how direct marketing discipline can really help the overall development of a Net Marketing and e-commerce strategy. These guys took their time and did things right. They measured everything and focussed on adding value and creating loyalty instead of following trends and making a quick buck of newbies. Well done.
I promise I won’t go on about pop-unders (PUs) too much, but I couldn’t help laughing when this anti-PU editorial in US News spawned a PU.
August 4, 2001
Dan Gillmor of the Mercury News wrote an article on “lessons learned” from the first wave of e-commerce called “Don’t write off Internet commerce.”
I agree with the five points he raises — especially the first one about the Net adding value to retailing. I think this is an under-played aspect of the value of the Net. Especially when you consider that research suggests that 2/3 of web-influenced purchases happen offline.
I’d add that when looking at the likely success at e-tail of various products, it is important to assess the amount of information needed to make a purchase, the real-world availability of the product, and the desirability (demand) for the product. If information need and desirability are high while real-world availability is low, I think you’ve got a potential winner. At least from a sales standpoint. To make the business a success you’ll want to add high gross margins and low cost to ship. A unique branded product doesn’t hurt either!
August 3, 2001
The Globe & Mail was nice enough to let people know about the results of the recent AIMS poll in this article: “AIMS Poll Finds Optimism Amidst Dot-com Gloom.”
If I sound pleasantly surprised in the article, it’s because I was. The poll shows that the “meltdown” is not quite as bad as it seems. The Net ain’t goin’ anywhere folks, so let’s just get back to making it an amazing thing and not worry about the doom and gloom.
August 1, 2001
Junction City is running a nice little parody campaign (I hope) to get John Cusack to be the President of the United States of America.
In addition to their solid arguments for John in the White House (“He made the tough decisions in Grosse Pointe Blank. He couldn’t be bought in Eight Men Out.”), I’d add “He had a really great record collection in High Fidelity and it would be good to have some soul in the Oval Office.”
Of interest to marketers is the “Spread the Word” page. Remember, you saw it here first.
This whole pop-under thing is getting ridiculous.
I just went the New York Times site and watched as this pop-under loaded:
Here we have the Grey Lady, the newspaper of record for the entire planet, resorting to sneaky ads that look like Windows systems messages. This can’t be good for the image of the NYT or for the concept of online advertising as something that people might actually want to look at. More and more online advertising is looking adversarial to consumers. This pop-under actually goes to the effort of trying to hide the window title by adding lots of spaces and dots so that it shows as a blank box on your toolbar rather than revealing itself as a browser window!
I can’t believe this is going to do anything but harm in the long term.
My suggestion is that all publishers immediately stop accepting anything that is designed to trick visitors into clicking. That includes fake error messages or non-functional interactivity that just causes you to go to the advertiser’s site.
Now I’m off to play “whack a mole” with more pop-up ads.
The AIMS event yesterday was well attended and I was happy to see that we had an active and vocal crowd.
As moderator of the panel it was pretty hard for me to get an accurate read on the overall value of the session and I’d like some input on what we can do better for the next panel. If you have thoughts, please drop me a line.
Thanks to Farhan, Kevin and Nancy Lee for making the panel a pleasurable experience for me.